CompFox AI Summary
This case concerns an applicant who claimed a psychiatric injury due to workplace events. The administrative law judge (WCJ) found the applicant sustained an industrial injury to her psyche and that it was not substantially caused by lawful, nondiscriminatory, good faith personnel actions. The defendant filed a petition for reconsideration, challenging the applicant's credibility and the WCJ's findings. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the petition, adopting the WCJ's report and upholding the credibility assessment of the applicant. The WCJ's report details the legal framework for psychiatric injuries and the analysis of specific events, ultimately concluding the applicant's injury was predominantly work-related and not solely due to protected personnel actions.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case concerns an applicant who claimed a psychiatric injury due to workplace events. The administrative law judge (WCJ) found the applicant sustained an industrial injury to her psyche and that it was not substantially caused by lawful, nondiscriminatory, good faith personnel actions. The defendant filed a petition for reconsideration, challenging the applicant's credibility and the WCJ's findings. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the petition, adopting the WCJ's report and upholding the credibility assessment of the applicant. The WCJ's report details the legal framework for psychiatric injuries and the analysis of specific events, ultimately concluding the applicant's injury was predominantly work-related and not solely due to protected personnel actions.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.