CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration and denied the Petition for Removal. The Board found that the WCJ's decision addressed an interlocutory procedural or evidentiary issue, not a final determination of substantive rights or liabilities, thus it was not a proper subject for reconsideration. Furthermore, the Board found no substantial prejudice or irreparable harm to warrant the extraordinary remedy of removal. The underlying issue involved the rescission of a Compromise and Release agreement due to a lack of substantial evidence that a certified interpreter translated the document to the applicant.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration and denied the Petition for Removal. The Board found that the WCJ's decision addressed an interlocutory procedural or evidentiary issue, not a final determination of substantive rights or liabilities, thus it was not a proper subject for reconsideration. Furthermore, the Board found no substantial prejudice or irreparable harm to warrant the extraordinary remedy of removal. The underlying issue involved the rescission of a Compromise and Release agreement due to a lack of substantial evidence that a certified interpreter translated the document to the applicant.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.