Home/Case Law/JACKIE MOORE vs. PHYSICIANS CLINICAL LABORATORY, INC.; CIGA, by its servicing facility, CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES, for, FREMONT INDEMNITY, in liquidation;, UNILAB CORPORATION/ CNA STANDARD, LINES,
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

JACKIE MOORE vs. PHYSICIANS CLINICAL LABORATORY, INC.; CIGA, by its servicing facility, CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES, for, FREMONT INDEMNITY, in liquidation;, UNILAB CORPORATION/ CNA STANDARD, LINES,

Filed: Jun 24, 2009
San Francisco
ADJ4687404 (ANA 0322707)

CompFox AI Summary

The applicant sought removal of an order appointing a new medical evaluator, arguing the existing record was sufficient and the judge lacked objectivity. The Board denied removal, finding the judge's prior order to further develop the record was justified due to inconsistent medical opinions. The applicant also alleged judicial bias, but the Board found no evidence to warrant disqualification of the judge. Therefore, the petition for removal and request for disqualification were denied.

JACKIE MOORE vs. PHYSICIANS CLINICAL LABORATORY, INC.; CIGA, by its servicing facility, CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES, for, FREMONT INDEMNITY, in liquidation;, UNILAB CORPORATION/ CNA STANDARD, LINES, is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The applicant sought removal of an order appointing a new medical evaluator, arguing the existing record was sufficient and the judge lacked objectivity. The Board denied removal, finding the judge's prior order to further develop the record was justified due to inconsistent medical opinions. The applicant also alleged judicial bias, but the Board found no evidence to warrant disqualification of the judge. Therefore, the petition for removal and request for disqualification were denied.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

JACKIE MOORE vs. PHYSICIANS CLINICAL LABORATORY, INC.; CIGA, by its servicing facility, CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES, for, FREMONT INDEMNITY, in liquidation;, UNILAB CORPORATION/ CNA STANDARD, LINES, workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

JACKIE MOORE vs. PHYSICIANS CLINICAL LABORATORY, INC.; CIGA, by its servicing facility, CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES, for, FREMONT INDEMNITY, in liquidation;, UNILAB CORPORATION/ CNA STANDARD, LINES, case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

JACKIE MOORE vs. PHYSICIANS CLINICAL LABORATORY, INC.; CIGA, by its servicing facility, CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES, for, FREMONT INDEMNITY, in liquidation;, UNILAB CORPORATION/ CNA STANDARD, LINES, Case Analysis

JACKIE MOORE vs. PHYSICIANS CLINICAL LABORATORY, INC.; CIGA, by its servicing facility, CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES, for, FREMONT INDEMNITY, in liquidation;, UNILAB CORPORATION/ CNA STANDARD, LINES, is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.