Home/Case Law/JACQUELINE FINDLER vs. WALMART, AVIZENT, YORK INSURANCE
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

JACQUELINE FINDLER vs. WALMART, AVIZENT, YORK INSURANCE

Filed: Oct 13, 2018
Santa Ana
ADJ9052447

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the petition for reconsideration in Findler v. Walmart. The WCAB adopted the findings of the WCJ, who found that the lien claimant failed to provide sufficient evidence of the reasonable value of services rendered. This was because the applicable fee schedule did not control for services provided before its effective date. Therefore, the lien claimant was required to present evidence of reasonable value, which they did not adequately do.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the petition for reconsideration in Findler v. Walmart. The WCAB adopted the findings of the WCJ, who found that the lien claimant failed to provide sufficient evidence of the reasonable value of services rendered. This was because the applicable fee schedule did not control for services provided before its effective date. Therefore, the lien claimant was required to present evidence of reasonable value, which they did not adequately do.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.