CompFox AI Summary
Both applicant and defendant sought reconsideration of a prior award. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the award, and returned the case to the WCJ for further proceedings. The Board found that the Qualified Medical Examiner's (QME) reports regarding permanent disability were not substantial evidence because they did not adequately explain the reasoning for using grip strength as the primary impairment factor, especially given the applicant's reported pain. The Board also noted that the QME reports did not sufficiently summarize the reviewed medical records.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Both applicant and defendant sought reconsideration of a prior award. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the award, and returned the case to the WCJ for further proceedings. The Board found that the Qualified Medical Examiner's (QME) reports regarding permanent disability were not substantial evidence because they did not adequately explain the reasoning for using grip strength as the primary impairment factor, especially given the applicant's reported pain. The Board also noted that the QME reports did not sufficiently summarize the reviewed medical records.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.