Home/Case Law/JAGDEV PANDHER vs. ROSS DISTRIBUTION, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Regular DecisionReconsideration

JAGDEV PANDHER vs. ROSS DISTRIBUTION, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES

Filed: Feb 01, 2008
SBR 0335761

CompFox AI Summary

Here's a summary of the case for a lawyer in three sentences:

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the employer's petition for reconsideration, upholding the finding that the applicant's hand injury was compensable. The Board found the employer failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that alcohol intoxication was a proximate or substantial cause of the injury. Crucially, the available blood test results were inconclusive and explicitly stated they might not be accurate, and no witnesses observed the applicant exhibiting signs of intoxication at the time of the incident.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Here's a summary of the case for a lawyer in three sentences:

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the employer's petition for reconsideration, upholding the finding that the applicant's hand injury was compensable. The Board found the employer failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that alcohol intoxication was a proximate or substantial cause of the injury. Crucially, the available blood test results were inconclusive and explicitly stated they might not be accurate, and no witnesses observed the applicant exhibiting signs of intoxication at the time of the incident.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

JAGDEV PANDHER vs. ROSS DISTRIBUTION, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES (2008) – | CompFox