CompFox AI Summary
In Seitz v. City of Oxnard, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted a defendant's petition for reconsideration of a decision filed September 15, 2016. The Board deemed reconsideration necessary to allow for further study of the factual and legal issues to ensure a just and reasoned decision. Pending the decision after reconsideration, all communications and filings related to the petition must be submitted directly to the Board's Commissioners in San Francisco, not to the district office or via EAMS. Any other trial-level documents not related to the petition should continue to be filed normally, but parties filing proposed settlements should notify the Board as a WCJ cannot act on them during reconsideration.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
In Seitz v. City of Oxnard, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted a defendant's petition for reconsideration of a decision filed September 15, 2016. The Board deemed reconsideration necessary to allow for further study of the factual and legal issues to ensure a just and reasoned decision. Pending the decision after reconsideration, all communications and filings related to the petition must be submitted directly to the Board's Commissioners in San Francisco, not to the district office or via EAMS. Any other trial-level documents not related to the petition should continue to be filed normally, but parties filing proposed settlements should notify the Board as a WCJ cannot act on them during reconsideration.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.