Home/Case Law/JAMES SINGLETON vs. HANSON CONCRETE, TRAVELERS INSURANCE
Regular DecisionReconsideration

JAMES SINGLETON vs. HANSON CONCRETE, TRAVELERS INSURANCE

Filed: Dec 17, 2007
San Francisco
STK 199292

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied James Singleton's petition for reconsideration of a stipulated award for industrial injuries to his back, neck, and psyche. Singleton sought to set aside the settlement, claiming he was misled and that the disability rating was inadequate. The Board found no legal grounds, such as fraud or mutual mistake, to overturn the executed stipulation, which is considered a binding contract absent good cause.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied James Singleton's petition for reconsideration of a stipulated award for industrial injuries to his back, neck, and psyche. Singleton sought to set aside the settlement, claiming he was misled and that the disability rating was inadequate. The Board found no legal grounds, such as fraud or mutual mistake, to overturn the executed stipulation, which is considered a binding contract absent good cause.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

JAMES SINGLETON vs. HANSON CONCRETE, TRAVELERS INSURANCE (2007) – San Francisco | CompFox