Home/Case Law/JAMES TOWNSEND vs. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, HARBOR DIVISION
Regular DecisionReconsideration

JAMES TOWNSEND vs. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, HARBOR DIVISION

Filed: Sep 26, 2016
ADJ455873 (LAO 0886539)

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns a lien claimant, BCP Collections, Inc., seeking reconsideration of an order denying its lien for $$8,661.87$. The initial denial was based on BCP's alleged failure to provide proof of service for its Notice of Intention to allow the lien. However, the administrative law judge later vacated this order, recognizing proof of service had been timely filed. Consequently, the Appeals Board dismissed BCP's petition for reconsideration because the rescinded order was not a final decision. As no final determination of the lien currently exists, reconsideration is procedurally improper.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns a lien claimant, BCP Collections, Inc., seeking reconsideration of an order denying its lien for $$8,661.87$. The initial denial was based on BCP's alleged failure to provide proof of service for its Notice of Intention to allow the lien. However, the administrative law judge later vacated this order, recognizing proof of service had been timely filed. Consequently, the Appeals Board dismissed BCP's petition for reconsideration because the rescinded order was not a final decision. As no final determination of the lien currently exists, reconsideration is procedurally improper.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.