Home/Case Law/JAMIE HUSCROFT vs. CALGARY FLAMES, FRESNO FALCONS, STOCKTON THUNDER, TAMPA BAY LIGHTNING, VANCOUVER CANUCKS, PHOENIX COYOTES, WASHINGTON CAPITALS, FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

JAMIE HUSCROFT vs. CALGARY FLAMES, FRESNO FALCONS, STOCKTON THUNDER, TAMPA BAY LIGHTNING, VANCOUVER CANUCKS, PHOENIX COYOTES, WASHINGTON CAPITALS, FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: May 19, 2017
Oxnard
ADJ8804405

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) reversed a finding of no subject matter jurisdiction, holding that California's workers' compensation laws apply to applicant Jamie Huscroft's cumulative industrial injury claim. Applicant was hired in California by the Fresno Falcons and played for them and other teams during his professional hockey career from 1988 to 2000. The WCAB found jurisdiction based on the contract of hire and work performed in California, pursuant to Labor Code sections 3600.5(a) and 5305. The case was returned to the trial level for further proceedings on the claim.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) reversed a finding of no subject matter jurisdiction, holding that California's workers' compensation laws apply to applicant Jamie Huscroft's cumulative industrial injury claim. Applicant was hired in California by the Fresno Falcons and played for them and other teams during his professional hockey career from 1988 to 2000. The WCAB found jurisdiction based on the contract of hire and work performed in California, pursuant to Labor Code sections 3600.5(a) and 5305. The case was returned to the trial level for further proceedings on the claim.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.