Home/Case Law/JAVIER HERNANDEZ (FLORES) vs. LOS ANGELES DRUM & BARRELL, INC., LAWRENCE BRADLEY KAPLAN, SUBSTANTIAL SHAREHOLDER, UNINSURED EMPLOYERS BENEFIT TRUST FUND
Regular DecisionReconsideration

JAVIER HERNANDEZ (FLORES) vs. LOS ANGELES DRUM & BARRELL, INC., LAWRENCE BRADLEY KAPLAN, SUBSTANTIAL SHAREHOLDER, UNINSURED EMPLOYERS BENEFIT TRUST FUND

Filed: Apr 22, 2010
San Francisco
ADJ1439784 (LBO 0356898)

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves a workers' compensation claim for a truck driver injured on March 14, 2003, resulting in a 47% permanent disability award. The employer, Los Angeles Drum & Barrell, Inc., an uninsured entity, sought reconsideration, arguing improper joinder due to lack of service. The applicant also sought reconsideration to clarify that the employer should only receive credit for permanent disability advances, not other benefits. The Board dismissed the employer's petition for failure to serve the applicant and granted the applicant's petition to amend the award. The final order clarifies that the employer is entitled to credit only for specified permanent disability advances.

JAVIER HERNANDEZ (FLORES) vs. LOS ANGELES DRUM & BARRELL, INC., LAWRENCE BRADLEY KAPLAN, SUBSTANTIAL SHAREHOLDER, UNINSURED EMPLOYERS BENEFIT TRUST FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves a workers' compensation claim for a truck driver injured on March 14, 2003, resulting in a 47% permanent disability award. The employer, Los Angeles Drum & Barrell, Inc., an uninsured entity, sought reconsideration, arguing improper joinder due to lack of service. The applicant also sought reconsideration to clarify that the employer should only receive credit for permanent disability advances, not "other benefits." The Board dismissed the employer's petition for failure to serve the applicant and granted the applicant's petition to amend the award. The final order clarifies that the employer is entitled to credit only for specified permanent disability advances.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

JAVIER HERNANDEZ (FLORES) vs. LOS ANGELES DRUM & BARRELL, INC., LAWRENCE BRADLEY KAPLAN, SUBSTANTIAL SHAREHOLDER, UNINSURED EMPLOYERS BENEFIT TRUST FUND workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

JAVIER HERNANDEZ (FLORES) vs. LOS ANGELES DRUM & BARRELL, INC., LAWRENCE BRADLEY KAPLAN, SUBSTANTIAL SHAREHOLDER, UNINSURED EMPLOYERS BENEFIT TRUST FUND case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

JAVIER HERNANDEZ (FLORES) vs. LOS ANGELES DRUM & BARRELL, INC., LAWRENCE BRADLEY KAPLAN, SUBSTANTIAL SHAREHOLDER, UNINSURED EMPLOYERS BENEFIT TRUST FUND Case Analysis

JAVIER HERNANDEZ (FLORES) vs. LOS ANGELES DRUM & BARRELL, INC., LAWRENCE BRADLEY KAPLAN, SUBSTANTIAL SHAREHOLDER, UNINSURED EMPLOYERS BENEFIT TRUST FUND is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.