CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the applicant's Petition for Removal, rescinding the WCJ's prior order allowing the Agreed Medical Evaluator (AME) to continue. This decision stemmed from the defendant's violation of Labor Code section 4062.3 and Rule 35 by providing the AME with a Consultative Rating without proper prior service on the applicant. Consequently, the applicant is entitled to select a new Qualified Medical Evaluator (QME) if a new AME cannot be agreed upon. Prior AME reports remain admissible if they predate the improper submission of information.
JEANETTE VAUGHN vs. CENTRAL COAST COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE, AMTRUST NORTH AMERICA is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the applicant's Petition for Removal, rescinding the WCJ's prior order allowing the Agreed Medical Evaluator (AME) to continue. This decision stemmed from the defendant's violation of Labor Code section 4062.3 and Rule 35 by providing the AME with a Consultative Rating without proper prior service on the applicant. Consequently, the applicant is entitled to select a new Qualified Medical Evaluator (QME) if a new AME cannot be agreed upon. Prior AME reports remain admissible if they predate the improper submission of information.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.