CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of a prior decision, affirming that the applicant did not sustain industrial injury to his psychological system. The applicant failed to meet his burden of proof, as his testimony regarding alleged workplace harassment was contradicted by other witnesses whom the judge found credible. Furthermore, the applicant's credibility was undermined by his false statements about an Agreed Medical Evaluator. The Board incorporated the judge's reasoning, finding the applicant's claim unsupported by a preponderance of the evidence.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of a prior decision, affirming that the applicant did not sustain industrial injury to his psychological system. The applicant failed to meet his burden of proof, as his testimony regarding alleged workplace harassment was contradicted by other witnesses whom the judge found credible. Furthermore, the applicant's credibility was undermined by his false statements about an Agreed Medical Evaluator. The Board incorporated the judge's reasoning, finding the applicant's claim unsupported by a preponderance of the evidence.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.