CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to further analyze the apportionment of permanent disability in Jeffrey Zajdel's case. While affirming his overall permanent disability as 100% before apportionment, the Board found that the medical evidence regarding apportionment was insufficient. Consequently, the case was remanded to the trial level for further development of the record on the issue of apportionment, allowing for additional medical reports or cross-examination.
JEFFREY ZAJDEL vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LEGALLY UNINSURED, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in . This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in .
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to further analyze the apportionment of permanent disability in Jeffrey Zajdel's case. While affirming his overall permanent disability as 100% before apportionment, the Board found that the medical evidence regarding apportionment was insufficient. Consequently, the case was remanded to the trial level for further development of the record on the issue of apportionment, allowing for additional medical reports or cross-examination.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.