CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed applicant Jesus Rodriguez Eusebio's petition for reconsideration because it was not filed from a "final" order, as it only addressed an intermediate procedural or evidentiary issue. The Board also denied his petition for removal, an extraordinary remedy, finding no evidence of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. They determined reconsideration would be an adequate remedy if a final adverse decision is later issued. Therefore, both the petition for reconsideration and the petition for removal were dismissed and denied, respectively.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed applicant Jesus Rodriguez Eusebio's petition for reconsideration because it was not filed from a "final" order, as it only addressed an intermediate procedural or evidentiary issue. The Board also denied his petition for removal, an extraordinary remedy, finding no evidence of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. They determined reconsideration would be an adequate remedy if a final adverse decision is later issued. Therefore, both the petition for reconsideration and the petition for removal were dismissed and denied, respectively.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.