CompFox AI Summary
Applicant Jo Ann Dawson sought reconsideration of a finding that she did not sustain new and further permanent disability. Dawson sustained multiple industrial injuries, resulting in a $99\frac{3}{4}$% permanent disability award in 2002. A dissenting commissioner argued the award should be reconsidered to re-rate the lumbar spine disability based on a later medical report indicating a significant increase in restrictions. This dissent highlights an apparent doubling of the low back disability rating under the applicable schedule, which could increase the overall permanent disability.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Applicant Jo Ann Dawson sought reconsideration of a finding that she did not sustain new and further permanent disability. Dawson sustained multiple industrial injuries, resulting in a $99\frac{3}{4}$% permanent disability award in 2002. A dissenting commissioner argued the award should be reconsidered to re-rate the lumbar spine disability based on a later medical report indicating a significant increase in restrictions. This dissent highlights an apparent doubling of the low back disability rating under the applicable schedule, which could increase the overall permanent disability.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.