CompFox AI Summary
Applicant sought removal to disqualify an Agreed Medical Examiner (AME) due to alleged bias and lack of expertise, and to challenge the defendant's use of multiple attorneys at depositions. The Appeals Board denied the petition, finding no significant prejudice or irreparable harm. The WCJ's report, adopted by the Board, found the AME's conduct and statements did not demonstrate bias or a lack of expertise. Issues regarding the defendant's attorneys can be addressed through future protective orders.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Applicant sought removal to disqualify an Agreed Medical Examiner (AME) due to alleged bias and lack of expertise, and to challenge the defendant's use of multiple attorneys at depositions. The Appeals Board denied the petition, finding no significant prejudice or irreparable harm. The WCJ's report, adopted by the Board, found the AME's conduct and statements did not demonstrate bias or a lack of expertise. Issues regarding the defendant's attorneys can be addressed through future protective orders.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.