Home/Case Law/JOEL VARGAS vs. ROMERO'S FOOD PRODUCTS, INC., MITSUI SUMITOMO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, MITSUI SUMITOMO MARINE MANAGEMENT
Regular DecisionReconsideration

JOEL VARGAS vs. ROMERO'S FOOD PRODUCTS, INC., MITSUI SUMITOMO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, MITSUI SUMITOMO MARINE MANAGEMENT

Filed: Nov 26, 2014
Marina Del Rey
ADJ8765139, ADJ9014068

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration, upholding the WCJ's decision that the applicant did not sustain industrial injury. This denial was based on the applicant's lack of credibility and insufficient substantiating medical evidence, compounded by more credible employer witness testimony. The WCJ found the applicant's medical reporting was based on false, inaccurate, or incomplete histories, and the Appeals Board accorded great weight to the WCJ's credibility findings. Therefore, the petition was denied as the applicant failed to prove industrial causation by a preponderance of the evidence.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration, upholding the WCJ's decision that the applicant did not sustain industrial injury. This denial was based on the applicant's lack of credibility and insufficient substantiating medical evidence, compounded by more credible employer witness testimony. The WCJ found the applicant's medical reporting was based on false, inaccurate, or incomplete histories, and the Appeals Board accorded great weight to the WCJ's credibility findings. Therefore, the petition was denied as the applicant failed to prove industrial causation by a preponderance of the evidence.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.