CompFox AI Summary
In this workers' compensation case, the applicant's employer sought reimbursement from CIGA for benefits paid to the applicant following an industrial injury. The applicant was entitled to benefits under both California workers' compensation law and the federal Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (LHWCA). CIGA argued it was not liable because the applicant claimed benefits under the LHWCA, which is excluded from CIGA's covered claims. The Appeals Board, however, affirmed the WCJ's decision, finding that the employer's claim for reimbursement of California statutory benefits was a "covered claim" and CIGA was liable due to the insolvency of the employer's insurer, Fremont. The Board reasoned that the employer's payment of LHWCA benefits did not make them "other insurance" and the claim was for benefits due under California law, not the LHWCA itself.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
In this workers' compensation case, the applicant's employer sought reimbursement from CIGA for benefits paid to the applicant following an industrial injury. The applicant was entitled to benefits under both California workers' compensation law and the federal Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (LHWCA). CIGA argued it was not liable because the applicant claimed benefits under the LHWCA, which is excluded from CIGA's covered claims. The Appeals Board, however, affirmed the WCJ's decision, finding that the employer's claim for reimbursement of California statutory benefits was a "covered claim" and CIGA was liable due to the insolvency of the employer's insurer, Fremont. The Board reasoned that the employer's payment of LHWCA benefits did not make them "other insurance" and the claim was for benefits due under California law, not the LHWCA itself.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.