CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board reversed a prior ruling, finding California lacks sufficient connection to a professional basketball player's cumulative injury claim. The Board held that playing a small percentage of games in California and receiving minor medical treatment does not establish a legitimate and substantial interest for the state to exercise jurisdiction, citing the Federal Insurance Co. v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (Johnson) precedent. Consequently, the applicant takes nothing on his claim.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board reversed a prior ruling, finding California lacks sufficient connection to a professional basketball player's cumulative injury claim. The Board held that playing a small percentage of games in California and receiving minor medical treatment does not establish a legitimate and substantial interest for the state to exercise jurisdiction, citing the Federal Insurance Co. v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (Johnson) precedent. Consequently, the applicant takes nothing on his claim.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.