Home/Case Law/JOHNNY DURAN vs. DARRYL HITCHMAN, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, in liquidation, by BROADSPIRE, CENTREX HOMES, AMERICAN GUARANTEE AND LIABILITY INSURANCE/ZURICH NORTH AMERICAN OCIP
Regular DecisionReconsideration

JOHNNY DURAN vs. DARRYL HITCHMAN, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, in liquidation, by BROADSPIRE, CENTREX HOMES, AMERICAN GUARANTEE AND LIABILITY INSURANCE/ZURICH NORTH AMERICAN OCIP

Filed: Nov 14, 2008
ADJ4699173 (FRE 204280) ADJ2234380 (FRE 204242) ADJ201252 (FRE 206405) ADJ3631426 (FRE 213090)

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns applicant Johnny Duran's industrial injuries to his back and knees. The California Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA) sought reconsideration of a finding that the cases should be returned to arbitration for insurance coverage issues. The Appeals Board rescinded the prior decision, finding no arbitration is necessary because Zurich already established coverage for cumulative trauma injuries. However, the cases are returned to the Workers' Compensation Judge to determine CIGA's liability for benefits solely attributable to specific injuries where Superior National was the sole available insurer.

JOHNNY DURAN vs. DARRYL HITCHMAN, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, in liquidation, by BROADSPIRE, CENTREX HOMES, AMERICAN GUARANTEE AND LIABILITY INSURANCE/ZURICH NORTH AMERICAN OCIP is a workers' compensation case decided in . This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in .

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns applicant Johnny Duran's industrial injuries to his back and knees. The California Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA) sought reconsideration of a finding that the cases should be returned to arbitration for insurance coverage issues. The Appeals Board rescinded the prior decision, finding no arbitration is necessary because Zurich already established coverage for cumulative trauma injuries. However, the cases are returned to the Workers' Compensation Judge to determine CIGA's liability for benefits solely attributable to specific injuries where Superior National was the sole available insurer.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

JOHNNY DURAN vs. DARRYL HITCHMAN, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, in liquidation, by BROADSPIRE, CENTREX HOMES, AMERICAN GUARANTEE AND LIABILITY INSURANCE/ZURICH NORTH AMERICAN OCIP workers compensation case in . Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

JOHNNY DURAN vs. DARRYL HITCHMAN, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, in liquidation, by BROADSPIRE, CENTREX HOMES, AMERICAN GUARANTEE AND LIABILITY INSURANCE/ZURICH NORTH AMERICAN OCIP case law summary from . Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

JOHNNY DURAN vs. DARRYL HITCHMAN, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, in liquidation, by BROADSPIRE, CENTREX HOMES, AMERICAN GUARANTEE AND LIABILITY INSURANCE/ZURICH NORTH AMERICAN OCIP Case Analysis

JOHNNY DURAN vs. DARRYL HITCHMAN, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for SUPERIOR NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, in liquidation, by BROADSPIRE, CENTREX HOMES, AMERICAN GUARANTEE AND LIABILITY INSURANCE/ZURICH NORTH AMERICAN OCIP is a legal case related to workers' compensation in . This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.