CompFox AI Summary
This appellate decision reviews a divorce judgment concerning equitable distribution of marital property, maintenance, and child support. The court addresses the husband's appeal regarding the distribution of the Claverack property's appreciated value, his separate premarital debt payments, pendente lite support, and counsel fees. The court modifies the division of the Claverack property's appreciation to 75% for the husband and 25% for the wife, and grants the husband credits for pendente lite support overpayments and marital residence payments during litigation. The court otherwise affirms the lower court's findings, including imputing income to the husband due to his history of asset concealment and upholding the durational maintenance and child support awards, as well as counsel and expert fees for the wife.
Johnson v. Chapin is a workers' compensation case decided in Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This appellate decision reviews a divorce judgment concerning equitable distribution of marital property, maintenance, and child support. The court addresses the husband's appeal regarding the distribution of the Claverack property's appreciated value, his separate premarital debt payments, pendente lite support, and counsel fees. The court modifies the division of the Claverack property's appreciation to 75% for the husband and 25% for the wife, and grants the husband credits for pendente lite support overpayments and marital residence payments during litigation. The court otherwise affirms the lower court's findings, including imputing income to the husband due to his history of asset concealment and upholding the durational maintenance and child support awards, as well as counsel and expert fees for the wife.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.