Home/Case Law/JOLINA NEIDLINGER vs. STERLING JEWELERS, INC., XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE
Regular DecisionReconsideration

JOLINA NEIDLINGER vs. STERLING JEWELERS, INC., XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE

Filed: Jul 08, 2019
Van Nuys
ADJ11077399

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the prior award, and remanded the case for further proceedings. The Board found that neither the defendant's expert opinion nor the applicant's primary treating physicians' reports constituted substantial medical evidence to support the initial finding of industrial injury. The applicant's medical reports were insufficient to establish causation to a reasonable medical probability, necessitating further development of the medical record.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the prior award, and remanded the case for further proceedings. The Board found that neither the defendant's expert opinion nor the applicant's primary treating physicians' reports constituted substantial medical evidence to support the initial finding of industrial injury. The applicant's medical reports were insufficient to establish causation to a reasonable medical probability, necessitating further development of the medical record.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

JOLINA NEIDLINGER vs. STERLING JEWELERS, INC., XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE (2019) – Van Nuys | CompFox