Home/Case Law/Jon Amedee vs. Pacific Bell Telephone Co., Sedgwick CMS
Regular DecisionPetition for Removal

Jon Amedee vs. Pacific Bell Telephone Co., Sedgwick CMS

Filed: Sep 10, 2025
Oakland
ADJ8935903

CompFox AI Summary

The Appeals Board considered the Petition for Removal and the Workers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge's (WCJ) report. It determined that removal is an extraordinary remedy and found no substantial prejudice or irreparable harm would result if denied, as parties could present their case at trial. Consequently, the Appeals Board denied the Petition for Removal.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Appeals Board considered the Petition for Removal and the Workers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge's (WCJ) report. It determined that removal is an extraordinary remedy and found no substantial prejudice or irreparable harm would result if denied, as parties could present their case at trial. Consequently, the Appeals Board denied the Petition for Removal.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.