CompFox AI Summary
This workers’ compensation death case addresses two main issues: whether death benefits payable to a dependent under T.C.A. § 50-6-210 are limited to 400 weeks, and whether such benefits can be paid in a lump sum. The employee, Goldie Jones, was killed in the course of her employment in 1991. Her husband, Darrell Jones, filed for death benefits. The trial court limited the benefits to 400 weeks and refused a lump sum. On appeal, the Supreme Court of Tennessee held that the 400-week limitation for permanent disability does not apply to death benefits, which should continue until the maximum total benefit is reached or dependency ceases. However, the Court affirmed the denial of a lump sum, finding the plaintiff failed to prove it was in his best interest or that he could wisely manage the funds. The case was remanded for the trial court to determine reasonable attorney's fees.
Jones v. General Accident Insurance Co. of America is a workers' compensation case decided in Tennessee Supreme Court. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Tennessee Supreme Court.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This workers’ compensation death case addresses two main issues: whether death benefits payable to a dependent under T.C.A. § 50-6-210 are limited to 400 weeks, and whether such benefits can be paid in a lump sum. The employee, Goldie Jones, was killed in the course of her employment in 1991. Her husband, Darrell Jones, filed for death benefits. The trial court limited the benefits to 400 weeks and refused a lump sum. On appeal, the Supreme Court of Tennessee held that the 400-week limitation for permanent disability does not apply to death benefits, which should continue until the maximum total benefit is reached or dependency ceases. However, the Court affirmed the denial of a lump sum, finding the plaintiff failed to prove it was in his best interest or that he could wisely manage the funds. The case was remanded for the trial court to determine reasonable attorney's fees.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.