CompFox AI Summary
Defendant California Indemnity Insurance Company sought reconsideration of an arbitrator's award concerning liability apportionment among multiple insurers. The arbitrator had assigned specific percentages of responsibility to State Compensation Insurance Fund and Zurich for benefits paid. The defendant argued the arbitrator erred by disregarding medical evidence, ignoring liability percentages, and improperly inferring liability. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration to clarify that miscoded medical treatment expenses, erroneously labeled VRMA, should be considered as benefits paid for contribution purposes. The original award was otherwise affirmed with amendments clarifying what constitutes "moneys paid to and on behalf of the Applicant."
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Defendant California Indemnity Insurance Company sought reconsideration of an arbitrator's award concerning liability apportionment among multiple insurers. The arbitrator had assigned specific percentages of responsibility to State Compensation Insurance Fund and Zurich for benefits paid. The defendant argued the arbitrator erred by disregarding medical evidence, ignoring liability percentages, and improperly inferring liability. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration to clarify that miscoded medical treatment expenses, erroneously labeled VRMA, should be considered as benefits paid for contribution purposes. The original award was otherwise affirmed with amendments clarifying what constitutes "moneys paid to and on behalf of the Applicant."
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.