Home/Case Law/JORGE BARRERA vs. STEADFAST MANAGEMENT CO INC, CRUM AND FORSTER
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

JORGE BARRERA vs. STEADFAST MANAGEMENT CO INC, CRUM AND FORSTER

Filed: Mar 18, 2013
Anaheim
ADJ8056221 ADJ7902063

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration because it was not taken from a final order, but rather from interlocutory procedural decisions. The Board also denied the petition for removal, adopting the WCJ's report and finding no substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. Furthermore, the Board admonished applicant's attorney for misrepresenting material evidence regarding the employer's location and injury site. Ultimately, the petition was dismissed and removal denied.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration because it was not taken from a final order, but rather from interlocutory procedural decisions. The Board also denied the petition for removal, adopting the WCJ's report and finding no substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. Furthermore, the Board admonished applicant's attorney for misrepresenting material evidence regarding the employer's location and injury site. Ultimately, the petition was dismissed and removal denied.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.