Home/Case Law/JORGE HINOJOSA vs. BEST COACH TECHNOLOGIES, CHARTIS INSURANCE
Regular Decision

JORGE HINOJOSA vs. BEST COACH TECHNOLOGIES, CHARTIS INSURANCE

Filed: May 06, 2013
San Bernardino
ADJ8135969

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed a lien claimant's petition for reconsideration because it was not properly served on all adverse parties. The WCAB also issued a warning to the lien claimant and their representative, Advance Acupuncture Therapeutics, regarding sanctions for frivolous claims and misrepresentation of facts. The dismissal stemmed from the lien claimant's failure to appear at a lien conference and their unsubstantiated excuses. The WCAB emphasized that such conduct demonstrates disrespect for the system and will lead to sanctions in the future.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed a lien claimant's petition for reconsideration because it was not properly served on all adverse parties. The WCAB also issued a warning to the lien claimant and their representative, Advance Acupuncture Therapeutics, regarding sanctions for frivolous claims and misrepresentation of facts. The dismissal stemmed from the lien claimant's failure to appear at a lien conference and their unsubstantiated excuses. The WCAB emphasized that such conduct demonstrates disrespect for the system and will lead to sanctions in the future.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

JORGE HINOJOSA vs. BEST COACH TECHNOLOGIES, CHARTIS INSURANCE (2013) – San Bernardino | CompFox