CompFox AI Summary
This case concerns defendant's petition for removal following a WCJ's finding of an untimely utilization review (UR) decision. The WCJ determined that due to the defendant's failure to timely deny a treatment request, the WCAB could determine medical necessity, citing Dubon II. The defendant argued the WCAB loses jurisdiction after an Independent Medical Review (IMR) determination. The Appeals Board denied removal, affirming the WCJ's authority to address medical necessity when UR is untimely and concluding no substantial prejudice would result from denial.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case concerns defendant's petition for removal following a WCJ's finding of an untimely utilization review (UR) decision. The WCJ determined that due to the defendant's failure to timely deny a treatment request, the WCAB could determine medical necessity, citing Dubon II. The defendant argued the WCAB loses jurisdiction after an Independent Medical Review (IMR) determination. The Appeals Board denied removal, affirming the WCJ's authority to address medical necessity when UR is untimely and concluding no substantial prejudice would result from denial.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.