Home/Case Law/JOSE ESCOBEDO vs. CUPERTINO ELECTRIC, INCORPORATED, ZURICH NORTH AMERICA
Regular DecisionReconsideration and Removal

JOSE ESCOBEDO vs. CUPERTINO ELECTRIC, INCORPORATED, ZURICH NORTH AMERICA

Filed: Nov 24, 2015
San Francisco
ADJ10165269

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the petition for reconsideration because it was filed against a non-final interlocutory order that did not resolve substantive rights or threshold issues. The WCAB also denied the petition for removal, finding no showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, nor that reconsideration would be inadequate. The Board adopted and incorporated the Arbitrator's report in its entirety for its reasoning. Therefore, the applicant's attempt to seek review of a procedural ruling failed.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the petition for reconsideration because it was filed against a non-final interlocutory order that did not resolve substantive rights or threshold issues. The WCAB also denied the petition for removal, finding no showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, nor that reconsideration would be inadequate. The Board adopted and incorporated the Arbitrator's report in its entirety for its reasoning. Therefore, the applicant's attempt to seek review of a procedural ruling failed.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.