CompFox AI Summary
This case concerns a defendant's petition for removal of an order rescinding a previously approved Compromise and Release agreement. The applicant had alleged attorney pressure and non-disclosure of a psychiatric injury report, leading the WCJ to rescind the approval. The Appeals Board denied the removal petition, finding no substantial prejudice or irreparable harm to the defendant. The Board determined that reconsideration is an adequate remedy if the WCJ ultimately sets aside the agreement, and the matter will proceed to a status conference.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case concerns a defendant's petition for removal of an order rescinding a previously approved Compromise and Release agreement. The applicant had alleged attorney pressure and non-disclosure of a psychiatric injury report, leading the WCJ to rescind the approval. The Appeals Board denied the removal petition, finding no substantial prejudice or irreparable harm to the defendant. The Board determined that reconsideration is an adequate remedy if the WCJ ultimately sets aside the agreement, and the matter will proceed to a status conference.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.