CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration. The defendant challenged the finding of 35% permanent disability, no apportionment, and the EDD reimbursement. The Board found that the defense medical expert's opinion on apportionment was not substantial evidence as it was based on incorrect assumptions and lacked proper explanation. The Board also found no need to amend the general award for future medical treatment, stating any disputes could be resolved at the trial level.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration. The defendant challenged the finding of 35% permanent disability, no apportionment, and the EDD reimbursement. The Board found that the defense medical expert's opinion on apportionment was not substantial evidence as it was based on incorrect assumptions and lacked proper explanation. The Board also found no need to amend the general award for future medical treatment, stating any disputes could be resolved at the trial level.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.