CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration because it sought to challenge an interlocutory procedural order, not a final decision. Furthermore, the petition was deemed skeletal, lacking specific references to evidence or legal principles. The Board also denied the applicant's request for removal, finding no showing of prejudice or irreparable harm, as the Judge had already indicated intent to address the applicant's concerns about extraneous medical records. The Board encouraged the Judge to issue the anticipated order and schedule a conference to resolve pending issues.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration because it sought to challenge an interlocutory procedural order, not a final decision. Furthermore, the petition was deemed skeletal, lacking specific references to evidence or legal principles. The Board also denied the applicant's request for removal, finding no showing of prejudice or irreparable harm, as the Judge had already indicated intent to address the applicant's concerns about extraneous medical records. The Board encouraged the Judge to issue the anticipated order and schedule a conference to resolve pending issues.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.