CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and reversed a prior decision, finding the applicant's injury arose out of and in the course of employment. The Board determined the employer failed to prove the applicant's fall from a steel column constituted prohibited "horseplay" or a deviation from employment. Crucially, the parties had stipulated that but for the horseplay defense, the injury would be considered industrial. The Board found the applicant's activity, even if not for the stated purpose of checking plumbness, was not so removed from his duties as to be outside the scope of employment.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and reversed a prior decision, finding the applicant's injury arose out of and in the course of employment. The Board determined the employer failed to prove the applicant's fall from a steel column constituted prohibited "horseplay" or a deviation from employment. Crucially, the parties had stipulated that but for the horseplay defense, the injury would be considered industrial. The Board found the applicant's activity, even if not for the stated purpose of checking plumbness, was not so removed from his duties as to be outside the scope of employment.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.