CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration. The Board affirmed the finding that the applicant, an office technician, sustained an industrial heart injury. This was based on the determination that the applicant performed custodial duties, as defined by Labor Code section 3212.2 and relevant case law. Such duties included supervising inmates, managing their work and conduct, and accounting for equipment, which qualified her for the presumption of industrial injury.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration. The Board affirmed the finding that the applicant, an office technician, sustained an industrial heart injury. This was based on the determination that the applicant performed custodial duties, as defined by Labor Code section 3212.2 and relevant case law. Such duties included supervising inmates, managing their work and conduct, and accounting for equipment, which qualified her for the presumption of industrial injury.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.