Home/Case Law/JUDITH MURILLO vs. G & M OIL COMPANY, ZURICH, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES
Regular DecisionReconsideration

JUDITH MURILLO vs. G & M OIL COMPANY, ZURICH, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES

Filed: Mar 07, 2018
Long Beach
ADJ9008503

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed a petition for reconsideration and denied a petition for removal. The WCAB found that the prior order was not a "final" order as it only addressed an intermediate procedural or evidentiary issue, not substantive rights or liabilities. Furthermore, the petitioner failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm to warrant the extraordinary remedy of removal. Therefore, the WCAB concluded reconsideration would be an adequate remedy if a final adverse decision is ultimately issued.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed a petition for reconsideration and denied a petition for removal. The WCAB found that the prior order was not a "final" order as it only addressed an intermediate procedural or evidentiary issue, not substantive rights or liabilities. Furthermore, the petitioner failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm to warrant the extraordinary remedy of removal. Therefore, the WCAB concluded reconsideration would be an adequate remedy if a final adverse decision is ultimately issued.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

JUDITH MURILLO vs. G & M OIL COMPANY, ZURICH, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES (2018) – Long Beach | CompFox