Home/Case Law/JUDY HICE vs. HENRY MAYO NEWHALL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, MAJESTIC INSURANCE COMPANY, U.S. FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY/CRUM & FORSTER GROUP
Regular DecisionReconsideration

JUDY HICE vs. HENRY MAYO NEWHALL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, MAJESTIC INSURANCE COMPANY, U.S. FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY/CRUM & FORSTER GROUP

Filed: May 02, 2011
San Francisco
ADJ483951

CompFox AI Summary

In Hice v. Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration to further review a defendant's appeal. The defendant challenged the finding of injury dates, arguing the last date of exposure should be the last day of work, and that the administrative law judge (WCJ) disregarded the agreed medical examiner's opinion. After review, the WCAB affirmed the WCJ's Amended Findings and Award. The WCAB adopted and incorporated the WCJ's reasoning in their decision to uphold the original award.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

In Hice v. Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration to further review a defendant's appeal. The defendant challenged the finding of injury dates, arguing the last date of exposure should be the last day of work, and that the administrative law judge (WCJ) disregarded the agreed medical examiner's opinion. After review, the WCAB affirmed the WCJ's Amended Findings and Award. The WCAB adopted and incorporated the WCJ's reasoning in their decision to uphold the original award.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.