Home/Case Law/Judy Vasquez vs. FIDELITY FINANCIAL, THE HARTFORD, administered by Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.
Regular DecisionReconsideration

Judy Vasquez vs. FIDELITY FINANCIAL, THE HARTFORD, administered by Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.

Filed: Sep 27, 2012
Van Nuys
ADJ6623550

CompFox AI Summary

Here are the summaries for the two cases:

Vasquez v. Fidelity Financial:

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration, affirming the administrative law judge's decision that Judy Vasquez sustained 20% permanent disability for a cumulative trauma injury to her hands and wrists. The Board found that the Qualified Medical Evaluator reports relied upon by the judge constituted substantial medical evidence. Applicant's contention that the judge erred by not finding injury to her back was also rejected.

White v. ABC Design & Marketing, Inc.:

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration, affirming the administrative law judge's finding that Rosalie White failed to meet her burden of proof for an industrial injury. The judge found the applicant's testimony regarding injury to her psyche, headaches, stress, and right hand lacked credibility. The decision was based on inconsistencies in the applicant's account and a lack of credible evidence to support her claim of workplace-caused disability or need for medical treatment.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Here are the summaries for the two cases:

Vasquez v. Fidelity Financial:

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration, affirming the administrative law judge's decision that Judy Vasquez sustained 20% permanent disability for a cumulative trauma injury to her hands and wrists. The Board found that the Qualified Medical Evaluator reports relied upon by the judge constituted substantial medical evidence. Applicant's contention that the judge erred by not finding injury to her back was also rejected.

White v. ABC Design & Marketing, Inc.:

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration, affirming the administrative law judge's finding that Rosalie White failed to meet her burden of proof for an industrial injury. The judge found the applicant's testimony regarding injury to her psyche, headaches, stress, and right hand lacked credibility. The decision was based on inconsistencies in the applicant's account and a lack of credible evidence to support her claim of workplace-caused disability or need for medical treatment.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.