CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration, holding that interlocutory procedural orders, like the order vacating submission, are not final decisions subject to reconsideration. The Board also denied the defendant's Petition for Removal, finding no showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. The WCJ's order to have the Agreed Medical Examiner comment on post-surgery status remains in effect. The matter will return to the WCJ for further proceedings.
JUDY WRIGHT vs. WASHINGTON MUTUAL, ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY is a workers' compensation case decided in Riverside. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Riverside.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration, holding that interlocutory procedural orders, like the order vacating submission, are not final decisions subject to reconsideration. The Board also denied the defendant's Petition for Removal, finding no showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. The WCJ's order to have the Agreed Medical Examiner comment on post-surgery status remains in effect. The matter will return to the WCJ for further proceedings.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.