Home/Case Law/Kari Moulthrop vs. SUTTER MEDICAL FOUNDATION, SUTTER HEALTH WORKERS' COMPENSATION (Claims Administrator)
Regular DecisionWorkers' Compensation

Kari Moulthrop vs. SUTTER MEDICAL FOUNDATION, SUTTER HEALTH WORKERS' COMPENSATION (Claims Administrator)

Filed: Dec 29, 2014
Salinas
ADJ6454697

CompFox AI Summary

The Appeals Board denied Applicant's Petition for Removal, which sought to rescind an order setting a trial on the issue of amending a permanent total disability indemnity rate. Removal is an extraordinary remedy requiring a showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, which Applicant failed to demonstrate. The Board found a good faith legal issue regarding whether the indemnity rate constituted a clerical or judicial error, which requires adjudication at trial. Reconsideration remains an adequate remedy if the Applicant is adversely affected by the trial outcome.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Appeals Board denied Applicant's Petition for Removal, which sought to rescind an order setting a trial on the issue of amending a permanent total disability indemnity rate. Removal is an extraordinary remedy requiring a showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm, which Applicant failed to demonstrate. The Board found a good faith legal issue regarding whether the indemnity rate constituted a clerical or judicial error, which requires adjudication at trial. Reconsideration remains an adequate remedy if the Applicant is adversely affected by the trial outcome.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.