CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied all petitions for reconsideration regarding an applicant's industrial injuries. The Board affirmed the original finding that the applicant sustained injuries to her low back and gastrointestinal system, but denied claims for psychological, hip, knee, and hypertension issues. The Board found no clerical error in the finding of gastrointestinal injury and clarified that Clarendon Insurance Company's obligation to pay permanent disability indemnity was distinct from CIGA's liability. Ultimately, the Board concluded that Clarendon's petition lacked merit and its obligation to pay the awarded permanent disability indemnity was clear.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied all petitions for reconsideration regarding an applicant's industrial injuries. The Board affirmed the original finding that the applicant sustained injuries to her low back and gastrointestinal system, but denied claims for psychological, hip, knee, and hypertension issues. The Board found no clerical error in the finding of gastrointestinal injury and clarified that Clarendon Insurance Company's obligation to pay permanent disability indemnity was distinct from CIGA's liability. Ultimately, the Board concluded that Clarendon's petition lacked merit and its obligation to pay the awarded permanent disability indemnity was clear.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.