CompFox AI Summary
In Bracken v. Team Commercial Construction, the applicant sought reconsideration of a Finding of Fact that barred his psychiatric injury claim under Labor Code section 3208.3(d). The applicant argued that his employment duration exceeded the required six months for a compensable consequence psychiatric injury. However, stipulated facts revealed the applicant worked for the employer for less than the six-month period stipulated by the statute. The Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's decision, finding the psychiatric claim barred.
KEVIN BRACKEN vs. TEAM COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, for CAL COMP, In Liquidation, Adjusted By SEDGWICK CMS is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
In Bracken v. Team Commercial Construction, the applicant sought reconsideration of a Finding of Fact that barred his psychiatric injury claim under Labor Code section 3208.3(d). The applicant argued that his employment duration exceeded the required six months for a compensable consequence psychiatric injury. However, stipulated facts revealed the applicant worked for the employer for less than the six-month period stipulated by the statute. The Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's decision, finding the psychiatric claim barred.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.