CompFox AI Summary
The Appeals Board rescinded a prior award, finding insufficient medical evidence to support industrial causation for the applicant's gastrointestinal injuries. Dr. Hammerman's opinion was deemed not substantial medical evidence as he did not adequately explain how he reached a causation conclusion without an initially recommended endoscopy. The case is returned to the trial level for further medical development of the record regarding gastrointestinal complaints. The Board emphasized its duty to ensure substantial justice and develop undeveloped matters.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Appeals Board rescinded a prior award, finding insufficient medical evidence to support industrial causation for the applicant's gastrointestinal injuries. Dr. Hammerman's opinion was deemed not substantial medical evidence as he did not adequately explain how he reached a causation conclusion without an initially recommended endoscopy. The case is returned to the trial level for further medical development of the record regarding gastrointestinal complaints. The Board emphasized its duty to ensure substantial justice and develop undeveloped matters.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.