CompFox AI Summary
Plaintiff Patsy Lee Koch (Wife) sued defendant Mark Francis Koch (Husband) for divorce and related relief, with Husband filing a counterclaim. The parties married in 1977 and had two minor children. The marriage was contentious, leading to divorce proceedings initiated by Wife in March 1990. After a non-jury trial and motions, a final decree was entered on January 11, 1993, divorcing the parties, awarding Wife custody of the children, specifying Husband's visitation rights, ordering Husband to pay child support and a portion of Wife's attorney fees, and dividing marital property (45% to Wife, 55% to Husband). Husband appealed five issues, and Wife presented five additional issues. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's findings regarding Wife's alleged perjury, the child custody award, the valuation of Husband's business, the determination of Husband's income for child support, the deviation from child support guidelines, and the attorney fee award. The court also affirmed the marital property division and the decision not to award Wife alimony.
Koch v. Koch is a workers' compensation case decided in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Court of Appeals of Tennessee.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Plaintiff Patsy Lee Koch (Wife) sued defendant Mark Francis Koch (Husband) for divorce and related relief, with Husband filing a counterclaim. The parties married in 1977 and had two minor children. The marriage was contentious, leading to divorce proceedings initiated by Wife in March 1990. After a non-jury trial and motions, a final decree was entered on January 11, 1993, divorcing the parties, awarding Wife custody of the children, specifying Husband's visitation rights, ordering Husband to pay child support and a portion of Wife's attorney fees, and dividing marital property (45% to Wife, 55% to Husband). Husband appealed five issues, and Wife presented five additional issues. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's findings regarding Wife's alleged perjury, the child custody award, the valuation of Husband's business, the determination of Husband's income for child support, the deviation from child support guidelines, and the attorney fee award. The court also affirmed the marital property division and the decision not to award Wife alimony.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.