CompFox AI Summary
Stanislaw Kretowski, a construction helper, was injured when a brick fell during hoisting at a building owned by Braender Condominium and managed by Rudd Realty Management Corp. He commenced an action against Braender, Rudd, and Brend Renovation Corporation, alleging violations of Labor Law §§ 240, 241, and 200, as well as common-law negligence. The court found that plaintiff established a prima facie case under Labor Law § 240(1) against the defendants. For Labor Law § 241(6), an issue of fact was raised regarding 12 NYCRR 23-6.1(d), but not for 12 NYCRR 23-6.3(a), leading to a partial denial and partial grant of Brend's summary judgment motion. Braender and Rudd were granted summary judgment on the Labor Law § 200 claim, and their cross-claim for contractual indemnification against Brend was properly granted.
Kretowski v. Braender Condominium is a workers' compensation case decided in Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Stanislaw Kretowski, a construction helper, was injured when a brick fell during hoisting at a building owned by Braender Condominium and managed by Rudd Realty Management Corp. He commenced an action against Braender, Rudd, and Brend Renovation Corporation, alleging violations of Labor Law §§ 240, 241, and 200, as well as common-law negligence. The court found that plaintiff established a prima facie case under Labor Law § 240(1) against the defendants. For Labor Law § 241(6), an issue of fact was raised regarding 12 NYCRR 23-6.1(d), but not for 12 NYCRR 23-6.3(a), leading to a partial denial and partial grant of Brend's summary judgment motion. Braender and Rudd were granted summary judgment on the Labor Law § 200 claim, and their cross-claim for contractual indemnification against Brend was properly granted.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.