Home/Case Law/KUANE WASHINGTON vs. SANTA CLARA VTA
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

KUANE WASHINGTON vs. SANTA CLARA VTA

Filed: Jan 17, 2023
Stockton
ADJ11562102

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration of an administrative law judge's decision. The applicant claimed an industrial injury due to an acquired odor disorder while employed as a bus operator. The Board found that the applicant failed to disclose critical evidence, such as an emergency room report, during pretrial proceedings. Furthermore, the Board relied on the opinion of Qualified Medical Evaluator Dr. Yip, deeming it substantial evidence, which concluded the applicant's condition was not industrially caused, supported by the applicant's own testimony of not smelling odors on the bus.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration of an administrative law judge's decision. The applicant claimed an industrial injury due to an acquired odor disorder while employed as a bus operator. The Board found that the applicant failed to disclose critical evidence, such as an emergency room report, during pretrial proceedings. Furthermore, the Board relied on the opinion of Qualified Medical Evaluator Dr. Yip, deeming it substantial evidence, which concluded the applicant's condition was not industrially caused, supported by the applicant's own testimony of not smelling odors on the bus.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

KUANE WASHINGTON vs. SANTA CLARA VTA (2023) – Stockton | CompFox