Home/Case Law/Lane v. Astrue
Regular Panel Decision DecisionRegular Panel Decision

Lane v. Astrue

District Court, W.D. New York
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

Plaintiff Teresa Lane sought supplemental security income benefits, claiming disability due to numerous ailments including arthritis, asthma, COPD, and fibromyalgia. The Commissioner of Social Security denied her application. This Court, presided over by District Judge Charles J. Siragusa, reviewed the final determination. The Court found that the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) erred in applying the treating physician rule, failing to obtain evidence from a vocational expert, and evaluating Plaintiff’s credibility. Specifically, the ALJ's assessment of Plaintiff's residual functional capacity for sedentary work was inconsistent with medical opinions. Consequently, the Court denied the Commissioner’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, granted Plaintiff’s cross-motion, and remanded the case solely for the calculation of benefits.

Lane v. Astrue is a workers' compensation case decided in District Court, W.D. New York. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in District Court, W.D. New York.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Plaintiff Teresa Lane sought supplemental security income benefits, claiming disability due to numerous ailments including arthritis, asthma, COPD, and fibromyalgia. The Commissioner of Social Security denied her application. This Court, presided over by District Judge Charles J. Siragusa, reviewed the final determination. The Court found that the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) erred in applying the treating physician rule, failing to obtain evidence from a vocational expert, and evaluating Plaintiff’s credibility. Specifically, the ALJ's assessment of Plaintiff's residual functional capacity for sedentary work was inconsistent with medical opinions. Consequently, the Court denied the Commissioner’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, granted Plaintiff’s cross-motion, and remanded the case solely for the calculation of benefits.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Lane v. Astrue workers compensation case in District Court, W.D. New York. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Lane v. Astrue case law summary from District Court, W.D. New York. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Lane v. Astrue Case Analysis

Lane v. Astrue is a legal case related to workers' compensation in District Court, W.D. New York. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.