Home/Case Law/LAURA SCHOONOVER vs. FIRST FINANCIAL FEDERAL, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

LAURA SCHOONOVER vs. FIRST FINANCIAL FEDERAL, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES

Filed: Feb 01, 2008
San Francisco
POM 289340

CompFox AI Summary

The defendant sought a panel of psychiatric Qualified Medical Evaluators (QMEs) after disagreeing with the treating psychiatrist and alleging the Workers' Compensation Judge refused to order a panel. However, the petition was dismissed as premature because the defendant had not first requested a panel from the administrative director, a prerequisite under Labor Code section 4062.2(b). The Appeals Board clarified that judicial intervention is only appropriate after the administrative director has refused such a request.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The defendant sought a panel of psychiatric Qualified Medical Evaluators (QMEs) after disagreeing with the treating psychiatrist and alleging the Workers' Compensation Judge refused to order a panel. However, the petition was dismissed as premature because the defendant had not first requested a panel from the administrative director, a prerequisite under Labor Code section 4062.2(b). The Appeals Board clarified that judicial intervention is only appropriate after the administrative director has refused such a request.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.