CompFox AI Summary
This case involves a defendant challenging a permanent total disability award for an applicant who sustained a neurological injury. The defendant argued the QME's revised opinion on causation and disability was not substantial evidence, and that Labor Code section 4662(a)(4)'s conclusive presumption of total disability violates apportionment requirements. The Board denied reconsideration, affirming the WCJ's findings. They found the QME's reporting constituted substantial evidence, and importantly, that the conclusive presumption under LC 4662(a)(4) overrides apportionment requirements.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves a defendant challenging a permanent total disability award for an applicant who sustained a neurological injury. The defendant argued the QME's revised opinion on causation and disability was not substantial evidence, and that Labor Code section 4662(a)(4)'s conclusive presumption of total disability violates apportionment requirements. The Board denied reconsideration, affirming the WCJ's findings. They found the QME's reporting constituted substantial evidence, and importantly, that the conclusive presumption under LC 4662(a)(4) overrides apportionment requirements.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.