Home/Case Law/LETICIA MOTA vs. UNITED JEANS INTERNATIONAL, INC., EMPLOYERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY, PROCENTURY INSURANCE
Regular DecisionWorkers' Compensation

LETICIA MOTA vs. UNITED JEANS INTERNATIONAL, INC., EMPLOYERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY, PROCENTURY INSURANCE

Filed: Jun 01, 2016
Van Nuys
ADJ8959164, ADJ9501704

CompFox AI Summary

This case involves ProCentury Insurance's petition for removal, which was denied by the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board. ProCentury argued that allowing the applicant to obtain an additional medical evaluation under Labor Code section 4060 for a denied cumulative trauma claim would cause prejudice. The Board found ProCentury's arguments lacked merit, emphasizing that removal is an extraordinary remedy and ProCentury failed to demonstrate irreparable harm. The Board concluded that, in the interest of substantial justice, the applicant should have the opportunity to pursue the evaluation.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involves ProCentury Insurance's petition for removal, which was denied by the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board. ProCentury argued that allowing the applicant to obtain an additional medical evaluation under Labor Code section 4060 for a denied cumulative trauma claim would cause prejudice. The Board found ProCentury's arguments lacked merit, emphasizing that removal is an extraordinary remedy and ProCentury failed to demonstrate irreparable harm. The Board concluded that, in the interest of substantial justice, the applicant should have the opportunity to pursue the evaluation.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.